The natural right to a mother and father, and the LGBTQ war against it
By Easton Martin | June 10, 2026
Who deserves to have children? The debate over non-traditional family structures often centers on the desires of adults, but the conversation must shift to focus on the rights and natural needs of the child.
Children are individual human beings with inherent rights, not commodities or property to be acquired to satisfy an adult wish list. When society treats the creation and upbringing of a child as a right of ownership rather than a sacred responsibility aligned with human nature, the most vulnerable among us pay the price.
The biological reality of human reproduction is not an accident of history. Children are fundamentally the product of male and female relations. This biological design carries a profound, natural purpose that extends far beyond conception. There is a clear, inescapable reason why two men cannot naturally conceive a child. Human development flourishes best when a child is raised by both a mother and a father, as each parent brings distinct, irreplaceable dynamics to a forming life.
To argue that a child needs both a mom and a dad is not rooted in malice, even if the perspective sounds hurtful to those who desire alternative family structures. It is a recognition of foundational truth. Depriving a child of either a maternal or paternal presence by design intentionally denies them a vital component of their upbringing.
By re-framing children as individuals with a natural right to their biological origins rather than products to be distributed based on adult preferences, we preserve the true purpose of the family.
